Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Series 65"
From Countdown
The Doctor (talk | contribs) |
Graeme Cole (talk | contribs) (→Seeding rules are wrong: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Could it possibly be CoC XIV or a new set of specials, or would we have already heard about those by now? [[User:JohnnyCanuck|JohnnyCanuck]] 01:58, 22 May 2011 (BST) | ::Could it possibly be CoC XIV or a new set of specials, or would we have already heard about those by now? [[User:JohnnyCanuck|JohnnyCanuck]] 01:58, 22 May 2011 (BST) | ||
::: I think we need to start giving up hope. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 08:49, 22 May 2011 (BST) | ::: I think we need to start giving up hope. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 08:49, 22 May 2011 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Seeding rules are wrong == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've had it confirmed via Twitter that the method for determining seeding positions is number of wins, total score, then number of conundrums solved, not highest individual score. I went to edit this and found that the paragraph describing the seeding rules is given by a <nowiki>{{Seeding S39-present}}</nowiki> marker, the text for which is presumably defined elsewhere. How should we go about editing that? [[User:Graeme Cole|Graeme Cole]] 20:21, 15 September 2011 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 19:21, 15 September 2011
Does anyone know why this series is starting so early? They usually start at the end of June/beginning of July, don't they? JohnnyCanuck 16:41, 21 May 2011 (BST)
- Yeah, but I'm afraid your guess is as good as mine. The words, "Ask Damian", spring to mind. JRTerrier24 18:52, 21 May 2011 (BST)
- Could it possibly be CoC XIV or a new set of specials, or would we have already heard about those by now? JohnnyCanuck 01:58, 22 May 2011 (BST)
- I think we need to start giving up hope. The Doctor 08:49, 22 May 2011 (BST)
- Could it possibly be CoC XIV or a new set of specials, or would we have already heard about those by now? JohnnyCanuck 01:58, 22 May 2011 (BST)
Seeding rules are wrong
I've had it confirmed via Twitter that the method for determining seeding positions is number of wins, total score, then number of conundrums solved, not highest individual score. I went to edit this and found that the paragraph describing the seeding rules is given by a {{Seeding S39-present}} marker, the text for which is presumably defined elsewhere. How should we go about editing that? Graeme Cole 20:21, 15 September 2011 (BST)
