Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:COLIN 2010"
From Countdown
m (moved Talk:COLIN 2010 to Talk:COLIN VI) |
The Doctor (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:COLIN VI to Talk:COLIN 2010 over redirect) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 12:25, 16 October 2020
Lol okay then, Stewart. I was just getting the page ready so that I could work on it immediately that someone posted me any results, by slotting a person straight into the table. As you will be there yourself, maybe you are planning to do it though? As I mentioned in my last update, the 33rd person is a friend of Dinos, but I dont know what their name is. --Vande 19:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- What is/was your plan exactly - to acquire a copy of the spreadsheet or whatever used to keep track of the scores and then turn that into the wiki page? That would be an idea, if Ben isn't going to get straight onto putting the data up within 12 hours of the event's end.
- I'd assumed you knew about the 32nd person because it's you - was I wrong? And anyway, how do you know about this 33rd person? -- smjg 20:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I remember how difficult it was getting the results for CoLei2 - it was a slow dripfeed from various different people who were there. So, if possible maybe you could keep a copy of at least the end result table, as that is the bare minimum for these tournament pages.
- No, I am not going to COLIN. The 32nd person is David O'Donnell. Ben hasn't updated his website since he confirmed, but he is listed on the forum. Ben told me there was a 33rd person yesterday. Hopefully 3 more can be found before Saturday, so that is can be the first ever maximum attendance event. --Vande 22:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Strange - even having been away for the weekend, I would have thought he would have managed to catch up with the website by now. Especially given that it's the last few days and the last few places, and so keeping it up to date ought to be a priority. -- smjg 22:39, 26 January 2010 (UTC)