Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(My first impressions) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
remove all those that don't apply. Love and peace y'all. [[User:Nebagram]] 1707 25 July 2007 amended 1718 same day. | remove all those that don't apply. Love and peace y'all. [[User:Nebagram]] 1707 25 July 2007 amended 1718 same day. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == My first impressions == | ||
| + | |||
| + | A good start; however, the structure leaves much to be desired. We could have done with a chance to discuss things before giving it this level of unstructured content. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Firstly, what's with such categories as [[:Category:Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley|Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley]] and [[:Category:9-round games|9-round games]]? It makes more sense to categorise series than individual episodes in this way. Of course, that leaves specials, which it might make sense to categorise individually. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Moreover, was it one person's decision or the consensus of a small group of people to title episodes by the overall serial number as opposed to, for example, the series and episode-within-series number or the original broadcast date. That said, I'm not sure what I think is the ideal naming strategy here. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 18:13, 31 July 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 17:13, 31 July 2007
Welcome to the main page talk.
Editing contestants
One thing when categorising contestants, if a certain 'heriarchy' could be maintained, e.g.-
series winners/ coc winners/ finalists/ octochamps/ contestants of series xx/ contestants of coc xx
remove all those that don't apply. Love and peace y'all. User:Nebagram 1707 25 July 2007 amended 1718 same day.
My first impressions
A good start; however, the structure leaves much to be desired. We could have done with a chance to discuss things before giving it this level of unstructured content.
Firstly, what's with such categories as Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley and 9-round games? It makes more sense to categorise series than individual episodes in this way. Of course, that leaves specials, which it might make sense to categorise individually.
Moreover, was it one person's decision or the consensus of a small group of people to title episodes by the overall serial number as opposed to, for example, the series and episode-within-series number or the original broadcast date. That said, I'm not sure what I think is the ideal naming strategy here. -- Smjg 18:13, 31 July 2007 (BST)
