Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Countdown"

From Countdown
("plurals of mass noun" in the dictionary but invalid?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This article is taken from Wikipedia, which is entirely in line with their licensing, so don't worry. Not to mention the fact that Jono and I wrote 99% of it anyway. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 16:06, 22 July 2007 (BST)
 
This article is taken from Wikipedia, which is entirely in line with their licensing, so don't worry. Not to mention the fact that Jono and I wrote 99% of it anyway. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 16:06, 22 July 2007 (BST)
  
There's something inexact in the comparison with the French version. In the French version, the time is 45' for numbers but only 30' for letters ; that should be changed in the article. And in the case of a draw at the end of a game, a "conundrum" (though it is not called that name) is played to break the draw.
+
There's something inexact in the comparison with the French version. In the French version, the time is 45' for numbers but only 30' for letters ; that should be changed in the article. And in the case of a draw at the end of a game, a "conundrum" (though it is not called that name) is played to break the draw. {{unsigned|21:48, 2 March 2009|90.7.253.141}}
 +
 
 +
Why is "mankinds" invalid despite being in the dictionary? -- [[User:Smjg|smjg]] 20:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:07, 3 December 2009

This article is taken from Wikipedia, which is entirely in line with their licensing, so don't worry. Not to mention the fact that Jono and I wrote 99% of it anyway. Soo 16:06, 22 July 2007 (BST)

There's something inexact in the comparison with the French version. In the French version, the time is 45' for numbers but only 30' for letters ; that should be changed in the article. And in the case of a draw at the end of a game, a "conundrum" (though it is not called that name) is played to break the draw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.7.253.141 (talkcontribs) 21:48, 2 March 2009

Why is "mankinds" invalid despite being in the dictionary? -- smjg 20:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)