Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:JOLT"

From Countdown
(reply)
(Response.)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:BTW The next 2 weeks will be diverted to wikiwork. Got nothing better to do. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 13:49, 13 July 2010 (BST)
 
:BTW The next 2 weeks will be diverted to wikiwork. Got nothing better to do. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 13:49, 13 July 2010 (BST)
 +
:: Perhaps you could make this part of your wikiwork. ;-) I just think that if someone who doesn't know about the Wiki/c4c/etc. was to stumble across the JOLT page, it would be better for them to see either a blank page, implying it hadn't been started, or a page that was clearly being developed. If they saw the page as it stands, I'd be concerned that they would think that the whole wiki was that underdeveloped and leave. Hopefully you see what I mean?
 +
:: Best wishes, [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 16:42, 13 July 2010 (BST)

Revision as of 15:42, 13 July 2010

The Doctor, I appreciate your enthusiasm but please do not make articles unless you intend to at least start to fill them with information. There is a lot of information about JOLT on the old c4countdown Yahoo! Group which you should begin to read, collate, copy across and wikify for this article to be purposeful. Thanks, Chris 'Crispy' Philpot 12:45, 13 July 2010 (BST)

I mean..... it's worth having an article, but there is such a thing called development, and I was quite surprised that this has not yet been created. Someone like Howard or James can develop this. I don't play it, but the ball has to start rolling.
BTW The next 2 weeks will be diverted to wikiwork. Got nothing better to do. The Doctor 13:49, 13 July 2010 (BST)
Perhaps you could make this part of your wikiwork. ;-) I just think that if someone who doesn't know about the Wiki/c4c/etc. was to stumble across the JOLT page, it would be better for them to see either a blank page, implying it hadn't been started, or a page that was clearly being developed. If they saw the page as it stands, I'd be concerned that they would think that the whole wiki was that underdeveloped and leave. Hopefully you see what I mean?
Best wishes, Chris 'Crispy' Philpot 16:42, 13 July 2010 (BST)