Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Reams"
(Your message) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
...But only when Deso dies, right? [[User:Nebagram]] 30/7/7 9:05pm | ...But only when Deso dies, right? [[User:Nebagram]] 30/7/7 9:05pm | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Your message == | ||
| + | |||
| + | You mentioned x, / and *. Fixing these automatically is a good idea. Don't forget changing - to − as well. It would also be nice to clean up the placement of spaces in the numbers solutions – a space either side of an operator and no space just inside a bracket seems to be the best scheme. And what should we do with nested brackets? (()) or [()]? Obviously we should avoid unnecessary brackets, except possibly where they would benefit people who don't understand operator precedence rules. | ||
| + | |||
| + | IMO we certainly should apply the same notation to conundrums as to other rounds – incorrect solutions lowercased and with the ☓. It puzzled me for a moment to find an eight-letter 'solution' with no notation to indicate that it was wrong. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 16:43, 18 September 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 15:43, 18 September 2007
...But only when Deso dies, right? User:Nebagram 30/7/7 9:05pm
Your message
You mentioned x, / and *. Fixing these automatically is a good idea. Don't forget changing - to − as well. It would also be nice to clean up the placement of spaces in the numbers solutions – a space either side of an operator and no space just inside a bracket seems to be the best scheme. And what should we do with nested brackets? (()) or [()]? Obviously we should avoid unnecessary brackets, except possibly where they would benefit people who don't understand operator precedence rules.
IMO we certainly should apply the same notation to conundrums as to other rounds – incorrect solutions lowercased and with the ☓. It puzzled me for a moment to find an eight-letter 'solution' with no notation to indicate that it was wrong. -- Smjg 16:43, 18 September 2007 (BST)
