Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Countdown:Articles for deletion"
Mglovesfun (talk | contribs) (move to archive) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Alright, personally I'm not a big fan of TTTs although I think they are good for recaps, but do we really need this category? Especially with precisely one article in it? TTTs are not actually part of the game, they're part of the ad break. I suppose we're gonna start doing transcripts of the DC guest's piece as well? Still, I remain open to other arguments. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 08:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | Alright, personally I'm not a big fan of TTTs although I think they are good for recaps, but do we really need this category? Especially with precisely one article in it? TTTs are not actually part of the game, they're part of the ad break. I suppose we're gonna start doing transcripts of the DC guest's piece as well? Still, I remain open to other arguments. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 08:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Agreed it's probably the least important part of a recap, but nevertheless TTTs do form part of the programme and a lot of people do like them. I've a whole store of TTTs in my papers somewhere, and am much more likely to add them to existing recaps if there is a category such as this. OK, having only one entry shows it's not being used, but in my case at least I was not aware of the category until just now and in future will probably add items as I see them. I think it should stay, and maybe with it being known about, more entries will be added - might prove to be a cure for insomnia one night soon. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 07:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | (is the following line something that should've been removed in an earlier edit?) | ||
#'''Delete''', [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 23:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | #'''Delete''', [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 23:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 8 March 2009
This page is for nominating any article suspected of being unsuitable for this wiki to be delete. Please submit the name of the article you wish to see deleted under a new section by doing ===[[Name of article]]===.
Jade Goody
- I just don't find this funny. Mglovesfun 01:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I do. Charlie 22:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd still like this to be deleted, but it's currently 1-1. Mglovesfun 23:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Alright, personally I'm not a big fan of TTTs although I think they are good for recaps, but do we really need this category? Especially with precisely one article in it? TTTs are not actually part of the game, they're part of the ad break. I suppose we're gonna start doing transcripts of the DC guest's piece as well? Still, I remain open to other arguments. Mglovesfun 08:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed it's probably the least important part of a recap, but nevertheless TTTs do form part of the programme and a lot of people do like them. I've a whole store of TTTs in my papers somewhere, and am much more likely to add them to existing recaps if there is a category such as this. OK, having only one entry shows it's not being used, but in my case at least I was not aware of the category until just now and in future will probably add items as I see them. I think it should stay, and maybe with it being known about, more entries will be added - might prove to be a cure for insomnia one night soon. drawoh 07:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
(is the following line something that should've been removed in an earlier edit?)
- Delete, Mglovesfun 23:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
