Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Episode 1902"
(Importing from the famous Reams recap parser) |
(where's the line?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This page was assembled from the skeleton data of Mike Brown's [http://www.thecountdownpage.com Countdown Page], and the recap written by Mauro Pratesi. | + | This page was assembled from the skeleton data of Mike Brown's [http://www.thecountdownpage.com Countdown Page], and the recap written by Mauro Pratesi. {{unsigned|16:39, 16 November 2007|Dumper}} |
| + | |||
| + | ''"NOTE: While it did not affect the outcome of the game, both contestants' offering of NOUGATS in round 1 should have been disallowed, as NOUGAT is given only as a mass noun in the dictionary, and therefore cannot be pluralised, so the final score should have been 47 - 37."'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are you sure about that? Where is the line drawn re consideration of foodstuffs as countable because you can have portions of them? — [[User:Smjg|Stewart]] ([[User talk:Smjg|talk]]) 16:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 21 December 2011
This page was assembled from the skeleton data of Mike Brown's Countdown Page, and the recap written by Mauro Pratesi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dumper (talk • contribs) 16:39, 16 November 2007
"NOTE: While it did not affect the outcome of the game, both contestants' offering of NOUGATS in round 1 should have been disallowed, as NOUGAT is given only as a mass noun in the dictionary, and therefore cannot be pluralised, so the final score should have been 47 - 37."
Are you sure about that? Where is the line drawn re consideration of foodstuffs as countable because you can have portions of them? — Stewart (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
