Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:CoNot 2008"
From Countdown
(round 9 problem) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:03, 29 July 2008
I think it would be better to take the table 9 results out of the tabular format. The method of scoring used on Saturday didn't recognise three pairs, as is given in the results table at the moment. I would seem better to me to list the table 9 results as narrative at the end of each round.
Listing them as three twosomes often gives a very misleading picture as to the real score had the games been played as twosomes. The most misleading of all is on my game against Andrew in round 2, where I am shown as beating Andrew 30-21. Had we been scoring this as a twosome he would have won 42-30.
