Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Episode 4358"
From Countdown
(templatage alert) |
(revise earlier suggestion) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Thank you. You've probably noticed that I've included other words only where they beat what the contestants found. I don't know if there's a good way to extend it to show more than this (or distinguish between what DC/CV found and other words/solutions found by viewers) without cluttering the layout too much. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 16:33, 9 September 2007 (BST) | : Thank you. You've probably noticed that I've included other words only where they beat what the contestants found. I don't know if there's a good way to extend it to show more than this (or distinguish between what DC/CV found and other words/solutions found by viewers) without cluttering the layout too much. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 16:33, 9 September 2007 (BST) | ||
| − | ::I think from an encyclopaedic perspective, it's not worth recording which words DC bother to mention, especially since words get left out of the edit. I think we should list only words | + | ::I think from an encyclopaedic perspective, it's not worth recording which words DC bother to mention, especially since words get left out of the edit. I think we should list only the longest words from each round (excluding those found be the contestants, obviously.) Within those, maybe we should mark those that beat DC with a star (in case I do something statistical in future.) In general I like the lightweight look of the current page. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 23:54, 9 September 2007 (BST) |
:::Have a look at [[Episode 1]] to see how it might work with templates. The numbers rounds are rather painful but overall it's not bad. That would allow us to dump in existing recaps with a lot of structure. Everyone happy? [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:45, 10 September 2007 (BST) | :::Have a look at [[Episode 1]] to see how it might work with templates. The numbers rounds are rather painful but overall it's not bad. That would allow us to dump in existing recaps with a lot of structure. Everyone happy? [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:45, 10 September 2007 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 10 September 2007
I quite like the layout here, good work Stewart. If we can streamline it a bit more then I'll turn it into templates, then write a tool to dump in as many existing recaps as possible. Soo 02:49, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- Thank you. You've probably noticed that I've included other words only where they beat what the contestants found. I don't know if there's a good way to extend it to show more than this (or distinguish between what DC/CV found and other words/solutions found by viewers) without cluttering the layout too much. -- Smjg 16:33, 9 September 2007 (BST)
- I think from an encyclopaedic perspective, it's not worth recording which words DC bother to mention, especially since words get left out of the edit. I think we should list only the longest words from each round (excluding those found be the contestants, obviously.) Within those, maybe we should mark those that beat DC with a star (in case I do something statistical in future.) In general I like the lightweight look of the current page. Soo 23:54, 9 September 2007 (BST)
