Talk:Main Page

Welcome to the main page talk.

Editing contestants

One thing when categorising contestants, if a certain 'heriarchy' could be maintained, e.g.-

series winners/ coc winners/ finalists/ octochamps/ contestants of series xx/ contestants of coc xx

remove all those that don't apply. Love and peace y'all. User:Nebagram 1707 25 July 2007 amended 1718 same day.

My first impressions

A good start; however, the structure leaves much to be desired. We could have done with a chance to discuss things before giving it this level of unstructured content.

Firstly, what's with such categories as Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley and 9-round games? It makes more sense to categorise series than individual episodes in this way. Of course, that leaves specials, which it might make sense to categorise individually.

Moreover, was it one person's decision or the consensus of a small group of people to title episodes by the overall serial number as opposed to, for example, the series and episode-within-series number or the original broadcast date. That said, I'm not sure what I think is the ideal naming strategy here. -- Smjg 18:13, 31 July 2007 (BST)

1. Categorising by series is different to categorising by format because the finals used 14 rounds in the 9 round era. "Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley" is useful because there's no particular reason that presenters should change over at the end of a series (it was only a coincidence that Whiteley did so) although currently it could be done that way.
2. The naming of the episodes is by number because that seemed convenient, gives concise titles, and provides a useful sorting order for categories. Numbering by series and episode doesn't have any advantages over that. Original broadcast date might be useful, but it's problematic when multiple episodes are broadcast on the same day. We could create redirects manually, but that probably isn't fun. Soo 18:45, 31 July 2007 (BST)