Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Countdown:Articles for deletion

From Countdown

This page is for nominating any article suspected of being unsuitable for this wiki to be delete. Please submit the name of the article you wish to see deleted under a new section by doing ===[[Name of article]]===.

Jade Goody

Consensus - keep.
  • I just don't find this funny. Mglovesfun 01:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I do. Charlie 22:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
    • I'd still like this to be deleted, but it's currently 1-1. Mglovesfun 23:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • 1 'stay' vote. The punchline alone swings it. And it's not like genuine guest pages are serious autobiographies. Nebagram 00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Recaps with missing or incomplete Teatime Teasers

Alright, personally I'm not a big fan of TTTs although I think they are good for recaps, but do we really need this category? Especially with precisely one article in it? TTTs are not actually part of the game, they're part of the ad break. I suppose we're gonna start doing transcripts of the DC guest's piece as well? Still, I remain open to other arguments. Mglovesfun 08:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Agreed it's probably the least important part of a recap, but nevertheless TTTs do form part of the programme and a lot of people do like them. I've a whole store of TTTs in my papers somewhere, and am much more likely to add them to existing recaps if there is a category such as this. OK, having only one entry shows it's not being used, but in my case at least I was not aware of the category until just now and in future will probably add items as I see them. I think it should stay, and maybe with it being known about, more entries will be added - might prove to be a cure for insomnia one night soon. drawoh 07:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm certainly not against TTTs being added, but right now we'd have to populate the category, then add the TTTs back. Wouldn't it be quicker just to add the TTTs directly and forget the category? Things like Category:Partial recaps were generated by Dumper, it would take a human being a f-cking long time to do all that. Mglovesfun 13:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
If you can find a record of full details of every TTT since they started, then go ahead and fill them all in. If you can't, then of course this category should stay. Moreover, why do you think tasks 2 and 3 in this proposal are impossible? -- Smjg 20:06, 26 April 2009 (BST)
You seem to have missed the point; the category is basically empty, wouldn't it be quicker just to add the TTTs rather than add them to this category, add the TTTs and then take them out again. It adds two extra steps without any benefits, and therefore slows down the process of adding TTTs rather than accelerating it. Mglovesfun 18:11, 1 June 2009 (BST)

See also