Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tim Rice"

From Countdown
(+comment)
(+comment)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc
 
I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc
 
:I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 
:I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 +
::That's with the important caveat that Wikipedia is actually doing the po-faced stuff, which it now does.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 11:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:44, 1 February 2024

Why was the snark on Tasha Ghouri’s page removed but the snark on Tim Rice’s wasn’t?

I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc

I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--Launchballer (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
That's with the important caveat that Wikipedia is actually doing the po-faced stuff, which it now does.--Launchballer (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)