Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tim Rice"

From Countdown
(+comment)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Why was the snark on Tasha Ghouri’s page removed but the snark on Tim Rice’s wasn’t?  
 
Why was the snark on Tasha Ghouri’s page removed but the snark on Tim Rice’s wasn’t?  
  
I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc
+
I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc {{unsigned|14:25, 30 January 2024‎|Christy Cooper}}
 
:I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 
:I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 +
::That's with the important caveat that Wikipedia is actually doing the po-faced stuff, which it now does.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 11:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 +
:::A few of us don't like those type of comments and opinions on articles, so to stay on the safe side, I think they're better off excluded. [[User:TobyMcDonald|TobyMcDonald]] 18:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:59, 1 February 2024

Why was the snark on Tasha Ghouri’s page removed but the snark on Tim Rice’s wasn’t?

I don’t mind the snark staying, if the snark about Tasha gets reinstated- lots of pages have elements of comedy to them- Geoffrey Durham, Philip Franks, Joan Bakewell etc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christy Cooper (talkcontribs) 14:25, 30 January 2024‎

I agree. Let Wikipedia do the po-faced stuff. We should be able to have some fun.--Launchballer (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
That's with the important caveat that Wikipedia is actually doing the po-faced stuff, which it now does.--Launchballer (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
A few of us don't like those type of comments and opinions on articles, so to stay on the safe side, I think they're better off excluded. TobyMcDonald 18:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)