|
|
| (45 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | Welcome to the main page talk. | | Welcome to the main page talk. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Editing contestants==
| + | *[[Talk:Main Page/Archive|Archive]] for discussions from 2007 - 2015. |
| | | | |
| − | One thing when categorising contestants, if a certain 'heriarchy' could be maintained, e.g.-
| + | == Add ZoomDown to quick links == |
| | | | |
| − | series winners/
| + | I think [[ZoomDown]] is worthy of inclusion on here. [[User:Mclarenguy22|Mclarenguy22]] 17:54, 9 October 2020 (UTC) |
| − | coc winners/
| + | :So do I. Added.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 18:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC) |
| − | finalists/
| |
| − | octochamps/
| |
| − | contestants of series xx/
| |
| − | contestants of coc xx
| |
| | | | |
| − | remove all those that don't apply. Love and peace y'all. [[User:Nebagram]] 1707 25 July 2007 amended 1718 same day.
| + | == Christmas 2020 Specials == |
| | | | |
| − | == My first impressions ==
| + | Have just been announced, and apparently fulfilled. I propose that since these are being made-for-a-specific-date, they get normal episode numbers rather than the "S" prefix which is used for episodes out of sequence. Thoughts? [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 21:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC) |
| − | A good start; however, the structure leaves much to be desired. We could have done with a chance to discuss things before giving it this level of unstructured content.
| + | :This is the first I've heard of them, but seeing as this hasn't apparently stopped S40, S41 and S42 I wouldn't support the idea.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 11:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | ::Never mind, just spotted the most recent edit to [[Series 82]], and I'm amazed that they're proposing three episodes given they've still got one unaired to put out first.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 12:04, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | :::Damian's said it was sprung on him as a surprise ("we end on Fri 18 Dec" / (C4:) "what about the next week"). I sort of understand, but that wouldn't be my first thought if I were Damian, to do archive-diving. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 16:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | ::::Anyway, I would reply to your main comment by saying that "S" episodes were filmed out of sequence and dropped in where needed: Episodes [[Episode 445|445]], [[Episode 495|495]], [[Episode 1003|1003]], [[Episode 1523|1523]], [[Episode 2874|2874]], and [[Episode 4473|4473]] were all filmed and broadcast in sequence. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 21:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | Firstly, what's with such categories as [[:Category:Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley|Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley]] and [[:Category:9-round games|9-round games]]? It makes more sense to categorise series than individual episodes in this way. Of course, that leaves specials, which it might make sense to categorise individually.
| + | == Contestant positions == |
| | | | |
| − | Moreover, was it one person's decision or the consensus of a small group of people to title episodes by the overall serial number as opposed to, for example, the series and episode-within-series number or the original broadcast date. That said, I'm not sure what I think is the ideal naming strategy here. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 18:13, 31 July 2007 (BST)
| + | I have a really bad feeling many of these are now wrong (James changed them all about 10 years ago before C1 was champ and C2 was challenger). [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtMwRqYsKkg&ab_channel=MartinPotter this video] of the credits of [[Episode 312]] has the contestants round the wrong way and [[Episode 28]] I have partially changed. Worried this may now be epidemic. 22:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC) |
| − | :#Categorising by series is different to categorising by format because the finals used 14 rounds in the 9 round era. "Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley" is useful because there's no particular reason that presenters should change over at the end of a series (it was only a coincidence that Whiteley did so) although currently it could be done that way. | + | :I did wonder why certain champions, such as [[Jane McLeman]], appeared to change seats.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 13:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC) |
| − | :#The naming of the episodes is by number because that seemed convenient, gives concise titles, and provides a useful sorting order for categories. Numbering by series and episode doesn't have any advantages over that. Original broadcast date might be useful, but it's problematic when multiple episodes are broadcast on the same day. We could create redirects manually, but that probably isn't fun. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 18:45, 31 July 2007 (BST) | + | ::Do we have any solid evidence for the fact that champions move? [[Episode 15]] was also wrong, and if they don't move then 12-26 are also wrong.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 16:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | :::Champions stayed where they were until Series 37 I think it was - possibly a draw flips them? May send a message to Mike and Robbo as well on this. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 21:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC) |
| | + | EPisode 17: "Andrew won the toss." Oh bollocks. That means almost every episode could be wrong. Mike Brown says that Series 8 onwards should be fine, but yeah we're in a spot of bother now. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 20:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | And don't think multiple episodes on the same day won't happen - the series 53 quarterfinals 3 and 4 are proof of that. [[User:GJM|GJM]] 20:58, 31 July 2007 (BST)
| + | == Proposal for FA images == |
| | | | |
| − | :: Indeed. However, what is the practical use of categorising episodes by format? Especially considering that, as these categories grow, few people are going to browse them with any real aim. Moreover, the current system creates an inconsistency: we have a category of finals of the 9-round era, but no corresponding category of finals of the 15-round era. (Except that the very first grand final is categorised as a 9-round - is this correct?) -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 21:32, 1 August 2007 (BST)
| + | Suggest using {{tl|click Inline}} to link to the article rather than the image? [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] ([[User talk:The Doctor|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The_Doctor|contribs]]) 21:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | :::I'm sure adding a category for finals or 15-round finals is no problem, should it prove to be needed. Which it probably is. And the -era categories are very handy as a check, to make sure no games are miscategorised, misentered or similar. [[User:GJM|GJM]] 21:44, 1 August 2007 (BST)
| + | == Stuck Talk Page Header == |
| − | :::I take your point, I don't think categorising by format is fabulously useful. However, having the categories is harmless at worst, and if they do turn out to be useful adding them later would be a ton of work. They might be useful for some kind of automatic processing, even if they serve no purpose for human readers. Also, we ''do'' have [[:Category:Grand finals]], from which inferring the 15-round finals is not difficult if it were ever necessary. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 18:12, 4 August 2007 (BST)
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Server compromise ==
| + | Since the update I cannot yeet the "you have new messages" header from the top of the page. Just pointing out. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] ([[User talk:The Doctor|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The_Doctor|contribs]]) 19:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | What was the nature of the server compromise? Without any further information, it might look like the message on the home page was written by a scammer who has compr(om)ised the Reams account.
| + | == Featured Articles == |
| − | :I've not been told exactly, but it's plausible that the database on which this wiki is run was stolen, including all the passwords. Of course the passwords are stored in encrypted form, but if you have a weak password or a hacker with a lot of time then it's certainly possible to break that. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 07:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC) | + | The monthly featured articles are outdated and should match the current article. [[User:Mclarenguy22|Mclarenguy22]] ([[User talk:Mclarenguy22|talk]]) 13:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC) |
| | + | :You can change all of them except the current month's by visiting {{tl|FA {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}}}. [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] ([[User talk:The Doctor|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The_Doctor|contribs]]) 21:16, 29 December 2022 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | == Where I can find good quality films online == | + | == Episodes by contributor == |
| | | | |
| − | Where I can find good quality films?
| + | I'm really not sure about this. Quite apart from being incomplete (Alan Sugar, Gordon Brown, Maven Riley-Kovalev to name but three), there seems very little point in naming every cameo? [[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] ([[User talk:The Doctor|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/The_Doctor|contribs]]) 21:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC) |
| − | Can anyone help me?
| + | :If I remember correctly, I created it for notable people who either a) turn up twice, in which case there is no obvious redirect target, or b) already have their own page, i.e. [[Terry Wogan]] and [[Rory Bremner]], at which you may as well mention it anyway. Sugar and Brown can be redirected to their relevant episodes.--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] ([[User talk:Launchballer|talk]]) 21:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC) |
| − | :You can use Channel 4's 4oD service, although that can consume a lot of bandwidth. I don't know of anywhere else that redistributes Countdown. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 10:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==People with the same name==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Has anyone else noticed that a few contestants have had the same name. Look at [[Mike Brown]] and [[John Clarke]] for example, not to mention [[Linda Smith]] who was both a guest (indeed while I was on the show) and a contestant earlier on. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 16:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I have a hitlist of contestants with the same name, although it needs to be reviewed by hand. I'll post that when I get full Internet back (maybe tomorrow?) The guest/contestant clash issue hadn't occured to me though, I will have to check that out. I imagine it's fairly rare. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 21:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : I can't believe they had two different Mike Browns only six days apart! Is it the later one that runs The Countdown Page? I'd imagine so - I remember the website being mentioned when he was on, and would certainly have noticed if the same name had cropped up again six days later.
| |
| − | | |
| − | : We might need to start having disambiguation pages, or at least disambiguation links at the beginnings of pages. But what titles should we use? [[John Clarke (Series 11)]]/[[John Clarke (Series 49)]]? And when there are two in the same series - [[Mike Brown (first in Series 48)]]/[[Mike Brown (second in Series 48)]]? [[Mike Brown (Episode 3324)]]/[[Mike Brown (Episode 3328 et seq.)]]? -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 03:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::There are a few disambiguation pages already, which are named with the IMDB convention: Mike Brown, Mike Brown (I) ''etc''. But I think I prefer the by-series convention, although the Mike Brown situation is a bit clumsier. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 11:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::: I'm not with you. [[Mike Brown]] is, at the moment, an ''ambiguation'' page, i.e. it covers up the distinction between the three Mike Browns by treating them as one and the same. A ''disambiguation'' page, OTOH, is a page whose sole purpose is to list and link to different entities with the same name. And [[Mike Brown (I)]] doesn't exist at the moment. So what are you on about? -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 14:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::: I can't remember any actual pages like that, I was just illustrating the existing convention (which I think was set by Ben.) Most other pages are indeed ambiguous. I will post the list of potential problem pages today. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 17:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::::: Don't drag me into this. Nebagram 18:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Episode titles ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | It's been suggested before that we title the episodes by date rather than by Mike Brown's fairly arbitrary numbering system (which long since desynched from the production team's numbering.) This would be:
| |
| − | * Easier to search.
| |
| − | * Easier to maintain.
| |
| − | I could rename the existing articles automatically so it's no big deal. Any thoughts? [[User:Reams|Soo]] 21:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I would certainly find indexing by date more useful, and would welcome it. However, how would you cope with (a) the semi finals of series 53 (I think that's the correct series), which were shown on the same day as each other, just after RW's death? (b) Coundown masters programmes, shown on the same day as a regular programme? I imagine (b) is no problem, as such programmes would be referenced from a different page, if indeed they appear here at all. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 22:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::The 53SFs could still be titled by date, but with some suffix, e.g. "First semi-final". This shouldn't be too hard. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I personally prefer going series/heat number/qf, e.g. 57/GF for the most recent grand final, or 37/67 for a completely random heat. Maybe have the dates as redirects, and have MB's numbering also as redirect? Nebagram 22:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::That has all the problems of maintainence and searching as the existing system. Although I do like the idea of, say, "Series 53 final" redirecting to the relevant game. And yes, there'll be redirects all over the place. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Also I don't know where you got the desynching from given that the production team actually use Mike Brown's site whenever they need an archive. Nebagram 22:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::For example, the special 1000th episode was actually [http://www.thecountdownpage.com/series20.htm 1003]. They also got numerous other anniversaries wrong (e.g. Susie's 1000 episode) so if they do use Mike's site, they don't do it very successfully. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Solution to the [[Mike Brown]] problem==
| |
| − | | |
| − | See [[Mike Brown]] for my solution to the problem, if anyone has a better idea, change it, otherwise, shuddup! [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 00:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Although I can't be bothered doing all of the ambiguous ones by hand, any chance of getting dumper to do it? [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 14:29, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Serious wiki or not?==
| |
| − | What's with articles like [[Jade Goody]] and [[everyone]]? At some point we're gonna have to decide if this is a serious projet or not, no? [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 14:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I think we can have serious pages and frivolous pages, as long as the two don't interfere. We have pages about the DC guests for completeness, but I doubt anyone uses this wiki as a serious information source for them, and I don't mind them being a bit silly. The episode, contestant and series pages are held to much higher standards. You're right about [[everyone]] though. It is now an ex-article. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 18:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::I still think [[Gevin]] and [[Zef]] deserve some sort of page, after all gevincountdown and Zef's Countdown summaries have pages on here, I think? I might have a crack at the Zef article when I'm drunk (no seriously I will). [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 20:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::I'm not against them having pages if anyone can be bothered to write them. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 23:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Request an article==
| |
| − | Also taken from the Wiktionary, how about a [[Countdown:Request an article]] page, people might come up with some articles that are missing. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 20:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :[[Special:Wantedpages]] is a pretty good starting point. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 23:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Categories==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I thought I would create [[:Category:Countdown]] just as a way of keeping all the categories together, so something like [[:Category:People]] could go in that category, just to make sure every is accessible via at least one category. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 20:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Doesn't seem like a bad idea. It also makes [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories|this]] more compact. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 23:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==OED==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think the Oxford dictionary pages are the ones most needed now. I'd do them myself but I'm not as well informed as other people such as Ben, so I'd prefer to leave it. PS I've finished my [[:Category:Lists|lists]] for now. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 19:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==[[St John Daly|St. John Daly]]==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I was trying to access the above link from [[Series 4]] but it doesn't work, I think it's directly linked to the URL because the URL is http://www.countdownwiki.com/St._John_Daly where as I think on the real Wikipedia it would code the . as something else. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 21:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :It's actually a rather subtle bug with the URL rewriter that allows us to have such pretty URLs. You can access the page via [http://www.countdownwiki.com/index.php?title=St._John_Daly the long url] until such time as I can devise a fix. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 01:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::That works alright but when I try and edit it, I can't. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 17:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::Are you sure? The [http://www.countdownwiki.com/index.php?title=St._John_Daly&action=edit edit link] works fine for me. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 18:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::: Even clicking on 'article' on the edit link brings up those 3 little numbers: 404. Nebagram 20:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::::St. John Daly's now sorted. Now to do all the others whose names contain full stops. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 13:10, 7 October 2009 (BST) | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Wiki addict?==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Why do I try and sign my emails with four tildes? I should get out more. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 17:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I often try to do four tildes at the end of real-life conversations. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 23:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==Lists of lists==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Being a mathematical type, I always like lists. Something like [[List of guests by number of appearances]] would be quite interesting, admittedly not very interesting. I suppose the priority right now is to update the site so the end of [[Series 57]] and the start of [[Series 58]]. Anyone interested? [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 00:22, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I would definitely work on stuff like the Series tables which I can't build automatically. Most lists can be autogenerated at some point when I have more time. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 08:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Nice work on the new front page==
| |
| − | | |
| − | That's about it, really. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 12:38, 2 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Dictionary Corner guests==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ''Almost'' all DC guests now have images, but one fiendish GotD has eluded me: [[Merrill Thomas]]. -[[User:Jturner|Jturner]] 18:42, 2 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == 9000th page ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Richard James]] has the honour of having the 9000th page in his name. Hooray! The 10000th page should be along in about 2 or 3 years time, so that's one for the diary. This seems like a good time to say well done and thank you to everyone who's worked on the first 9000 pages, especially Ben Wilson, Howard Somerset and Martin Gardner who've put in a quite unreasonable number of hours. Thank you all. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 16:24, 11 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == What's in a name? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think we should standardise on referring to people (especially contestants) by their surname. It reads much more professionally. Calling them by their first name makes it sound like we're chatting about our friends, which may often be true but is not really in the spirit of an encyclopaedia. [[User:Reams|Charlie]] 16:05, 27 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :I'm certainly not against it, but if you say Holden and Wills it makes it sound like your an American sports broadcaster, which is why I sometimes thing first names is a bit more British. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 16:33, 27 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Useful new feature ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | If you head to [http://www.apterous.org/cdb/wikicap.php this page], you can see the wikitext versions of all recaps written with the Recap Writer in the last week (starting from today at least.) This should make it much easier for us to grab the latest episodes and post them here, rather than waiting to the end of each series to do a huge dump of all the episodes. I've also fixed a number of outstanding bugs with the wikitext generation, although it's still not perfect. [[User:Reams|Charlie]] 10:22, 30 April 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | : Only just found this comment. And used it yesterday to put one of my recaps on the Wiki. Any reason why it's limited to just the last week? One month might be more useful. I tend to work in batches, and I notice a lot of other people here do too. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 11:48, 2 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::No particular reason for the limit, I just didn't want the page to get huge. Everything is available in the database so I might make it browsable at some point. [[User:Reams|Charlie]] 10:35, 10 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::Doesn't help when someone puts a recap in five times, does it. Sorry about that. Got finger trouble last Thursday. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 12:49, 10 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Since the Corral has been replaced by the Coundown DataBase, is there an equivalent place from which we can pick up Wiki formatted recaps for inserting here? As a rough estimate, I think this facility meant that I was able to put about six recaps onto the Wiki in the time it would otherwise take to do one. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 11:00, 9 September 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :link changed from Corral to Countdown database [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 00:01, 18 September 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Any chance of keeping the recaps here again for longer than a week, Charlie? I've only just noticed that a historical recap was done eight days ago and not picked up for the wiki. It's no longer in the place which contains the wikitext versions. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 18:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Another decent idea ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Just out of interest I'd like to see a [[List of number one seeds]] and so on... obviously I don't think a computer would find this difficult to work out. As far as I know you can't put a '''#''' in an article title. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 16:39, 11 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : Associated with that list could be an indication of how far they progressed. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 16:44, 11 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Another good idea would be to talk about the behind the scenes element, such as the [[Yorkshire TV studios]] or the [[Green room]] for example, but I personally don't have enough information to write those articles. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 17:37, 19 June 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==1st of August==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Can I trust someone to update the 'article of the month' featured on the 1st of August as I will be in the middle of rural France with no computer. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 14:03, 17 July 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | : If nobody else has done it within a few hours of the start of August, then I'll have a go. I've located the August article. I think August is one of the few months this year when I won't be in France at all. Have fun. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 14:10, 17 July 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | :: I've made a couple of type corrections to the August article, but chickened out of activating it as Article of the Month, for fear of wrecking the Main Page. Can you have a look at it, Charlie? [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 08:33, 1 August 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | ::: Finally worked out how to do it. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 21:55, 8 August 2008 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Sorting surnames beginning O' ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | When setting up the page for today's winner Dan O'Hara, I gave him a default sort key of "Ohara, Dan". This would enable him to be sorted after a person such as John Ogden. This conforms to the British indexing standard, which decrees that punctuations are disregarded when determining indexing sequence. I see, however, that other similar names, e.g. David O'Donnell have been given a default sort key which includes the apostrophe, thus putting them all in front of someone like Annie Oakley. I believe the default sort keys for all O' people should be changed. Does anyone object? If not, I'll get on with it. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 16:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | : While you're at it, another standard that doesn't seem to be being followed at the moment: Mc should be sorted as Mac. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 20:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::I'd looked at Mc/Mac. But the British standard says that Mc should be sorted after the last of the names beginning Ma, and not merged with the Mac names. BT telephone directories specifically do not follow the British standard in this respect. I think we have the Mc names correct. I've just noticed that there are one or two others wrong though, and I'll fix them. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 21:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Zero at front of dates ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Someone seems to be randomly going through contestants' pages and removing leading zeros from dates of episodes. Looking back, I see that many series have dates shown without leading zeros, e.g. 1/04/2008, and others have leading zeros, e.g. 01/04/2008. Do we have a standard? The random removal seems to be very haphazard, it's as if someone once or twice a day is using the Random page facility, and then modifying the dates if necessary. If we do have a standard, and if I've not been following it, I'm happy to go through, in a more systematic manner than just picking random pages, and remove leading zeros. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 08:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | My personal preference is to have a leading zero; I think the date column in the series episodes tables looks neater when all dates are the same length, but I'm quite happy to have them either way. However, I'll continue to put leading zeros in unless someone rules otherwise. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 11:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == "Des the Pansy" ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | http://www.countdownwiki.com/index.php?title=Des_the_Pansy
| |
| − | | |
| − | Plus this redirect page, "Des the pansy":
| |
| − | | |
| − | http://www.countdownwiki.com/index.php?title=Des_the_pansy
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thoughts? (<small>unsigned message</small>)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think [[Des the Pansy]] and [[Jade Goody]] should be deleted. Very unfunny both of them. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 20:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Episode and Series sort keys ==
| |
| − | Not an urgent problem, and one that I probably will have no interest in, as I'm likely to die before it gets important.
| |
| − | Episodes have default sort keys of four digits, 0000 to 4732 (today's). Series have sort keys of two digits, 00 to 59 (the one that finished today). When we get to series 100 or episode 10000, the whole system of sorting episodes, sometimes by series number and sometimes by episode number, is going to break down. The first of these milestones will probably occur in 2029, so there's plenty of time to think about it. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 04:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == QF, SF and Final episode sort keys ==
| |
| − | Up to now, these categories have had sort keys equal to the series number. I've just changed the relevant episodes for series 1 to 9 qf, sf and finals matches to give them two digits, so that they appear before before the series 10 episodes, but for the QF and SF categories, they still sometimes appear in random order within a series. One way to sort those correctly is to change the QF and SF sort key to ss,n for the nth qf or sf of series ss. However, all we're trying to do is to sort them into episode order, and the default key will do this just as well. I therefore suggest removing the cat key from the QF, SF categories (and for consistency from the final category), and use the default instead. Doing this would also delay the problem mentioned in the previous paragraph for a further 10 years. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 08:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I thought I'd written something like this a while ago, and just found it. It's time we got round to implementing my recommendation about removing the cat key from all episodes in the QF and SF categories, so that the episodes are displayed in the correct sequance, and not what appears to be "Series Number" followed by "Date Recap published". [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 07:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | :: I've now done the QFs and SFs for the first ten series. That is the set of ten series which ends with series 10. I only added that last bit for the benefit of those who are yet to be convinced that the second millennium ended with the year 2000, the twentieth century ended with the year 2000, and the two hundredth decade ended with the year 2000. In just the same way, the seventh set of ten countdown series will end with series 70, and not series 69. :) [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 10:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | :::Doing the GF sort keys too as GFs seem to be sorted hapazardly. QFs, SFs and GFs now done up to Series 12. More later. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 08:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::::Done up to series 18 now. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 07:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::::And now completed. --[[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 10:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==[[Countdown:Articles for deletion]]==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I'd like people to have a look at this, I (we) won't delete the articles unless someone else posts a note of agreement. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 13:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I've added a couple more. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 23:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Appearances by lexicographers and guests==
| |
| − | | |
| − | There are many discrepancies between the number of appearances shown on the wiki and on the countdown page. Sometime these should be checked and corrected. Probably the worst is Susie Dent's page, which shows her last episode as one midway through her maternity leave. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 20:11, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Celebrity Countdown - missing links==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The eight games played in the [http://www.countdownwiki.com/Celebrity_Countdown Celebrity Countdown series] have little coverage. Five of the contestants don't have pages, neither do seven of the guests. These should all be easy to create. Also, only one of the eight games is recapped. We might need access to Mike Brown's notes to remedy this. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 19:47, 8 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | : Well done! They're looking good. I've just had a look at the one game that does have a recap page, and see that it's a summary only, and doesn't have episode details. There should be no difficulty in doing the same for the other seven. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 11:34, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :: I'm pretty certain John Cole was the weather man, and yes, you've got the correct Andy Gray. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 11:37, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::No, John Cole was the ITN political correpondent years ago - I remember he had a very strong accent. Maybe you're thinking of John Kettley . . .
| |
| − | Is the summary OK? I'm not too sure. But thanks for letting me do this, it's great fun, and I'm learning a lot about the wiki. [[User:Kai Laddiman|Countdown Kid]] 23:43, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | : C2 summary looks good. Yes, probably "second episode" should be bold, to match "first episode". And the red link at the bottom needs attention. Have a look at what's done for that link in C1. Best way to learn about wiki is to try it. I've heard rumours that wiki handling may be brought into the national curriculum. You're doing well. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 12:41, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :: Just one small thing- CC games were 7 rounders (LLNLLNC) rather than 9-rounders. Other than that it's good, and something that's long overdue. [[User:86.157.20.244|86.157.20.244]] 14:12, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::Oh for Christs's sake it be nice it I could stay logged in once in a while. Nebagram 14:13, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::: The Bamber Gascoigne cat looks good, so does C2, except that, as Ben mentioned, they're all 7-round games, and that itself will probably need another new category. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 23:13, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::::Okey doke, I'll try and get that done. I think I've done skeletons correctly for the C-episodes, but there maybe a couple of mistakes for you to (if you'd be nice enough) rectify. :-) [[User:Kai Laddiman|Countdown Kid]] 23:17, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::::I THINK I'm done. If you notice anything, then do what you want with it - fix it yourself, our give me a call. :-) [[User:Kai Laddiman|Countdown Kid]] 23:43, 9 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::::::That all looks great. Well done, and thanks. :-) [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 00:33, 10 May 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == June article ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | We need a June featured article ASAP. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 18:08, 1 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :[[Kai Laddiman|Found one.]] [[User:Kai Laddiman|Countdown Kid]] 18:13, 1 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Suits me, will just need a bit of editing, then. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 18:19, 1 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == YouTube coverage ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Just an idea. Someone has recently added a few youtube links to some episode pages. Some are ideal, in particular the Harvey Freeman v Allan Saldanha game. It was good to get a chance to view that one again. How about a category for episodes containing youtube links? This could enable people quickly to find episodes they might like to watch, and see some old favourites. It would, of course, be a bit fluid, as youtube vids tend to disappear after a while, but with periodic attention it could be worthwhile. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 13:30, 9 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :Sounds cool to me. [[User:Kai Laddiman|Countdown Kid]] 15:56, 9 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :That sounds fine to me. [[User:Countdowner|Countdowner]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Inaccessible Contestants ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Can't get to the page of St. John Daly, contestant in Series 4. Searching on him shows that his page does exist, but can't access his page from any of the links. There's another player, who simply goes by the name O.T. Stumbled across him a few weeks ago, but can't find him now. Some of his links work, but others don't. It's possibly due to the fullstops in the names.
| |
| − | Sometime, when there's nothing better to do, need to sort this one. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 00:03, 26 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :Found the second one. He's Y.T, not O.T. and is in Series 8. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 00:12, 26 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::Now found a third. Mark St. John London, from Series 18. Looks very much like it's the fullstops. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 00:48, 26 June 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::All now fixed. At least all that I've managed to find. If anyone finds amy more, let me know. [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 16:31, 7 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == July featured article ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | It's now four days into July and the featured article remains as {{word|[[GANDISEEG]]}} - are we switching to a new one any time soon? -- [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 17:47, 4 July 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Tournaments ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Could we have a little box on the front page for Upcoming Tournaments? I think it would be useful for people to be able to just come to the Wiki anytime when they want to know if there are any imminent events in which they can take part. [[User:Vande|Vande]] 08:59, 23 September 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :Looks sensible. Hopefully soon I'll have a little time, and an available pc, in order to look at such requests. :) 10:04, 24 September 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Did you know... ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Inspired by Wikipedia, I propose a new section on the Main Page dedicated to interesting Countdown facts, which would be updated every month. Supposing the idea is popular amongst the rest of the wiki editors, I am happy to put the template together and place it onto the front page. Does anybody have any comments, criticisms, or suggestions for facts which would make interesting reading on the front page?
| |
| − | | |
| − | Thanks in advance, [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 16:47, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :Sounds like a very good idea to me, and a good way of encouraging people to visit more regularly [[User:Vande|Vande]] 16:58, 3 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::So long as no-one objects I'll begin this feature in November, and run it for a month at a time in synch with the featured article. In preparation for this, can anyone think of some interesting facts which appear in the various articles of this wiki? I'll start: did you know...
| |
| − | ::*...that in round 8 of '''[[Episode 4523]]''' the [[niner]] {{word|DECANTERS}} was spelt out in reverse order?
| |
| − | ::*...that original host '''[[Richard Whiteley]]''''s real first name was John?
| |
| − | ::*...that the [[Episode 3152|Series 46 grand final]] [[conundrum]] {{word|SANTASITS}} had two valid solutions?
| |
| − | ::The lattermost one is probably best suited to December, but hopefully it will inspire you to throw some facts my way! Thanks in advance, [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 11:59, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::*...that [[Kirk Bevins|Kirk Bevan]] achieved the [[Episode 4770|first ever known max game]]? [[User:Kai Laddiman|Kai Laddiman]] 13:19, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::::Cool, I've started to amass these into [[Template:DYK November|next month's first template]]. Feel free to edit it for now, and I'll lock it shortly before the new feature goes live. :-)
| |
| − | ::::Cheers, [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 16:58, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::::It might be even better if Kirk's surname is spelt correctly. But otherwise, great. :) [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 18:44, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | ::::::Soz Howard, just a little joke, wasn't serious :P [[User:Kai Laddiman|Kai Laddiman]] 19:30, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | :::::::np I know what he thinks when his name's spelt wrongly; I've done it in the past, but unintentionally. So on second thoughts, leave it. ;) [[User:Drawoh|drawoh]] 19:39, 11 October 2009 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Score template and episode tables ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I've taken the liberty to create [[Template:Score]] for writing game scores in articles - a little less cumbersome than writing &nbsp;–&nbsp; each time, and would enable us to change the style later. It works well in a paragraph, but would be rather cumbersome to embed in episode tables.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I therefore think we should split the score parameter of [[Template:ep]] into two parameters. The only trouble is that it needs to be backward compatible. I can think of two possibilities:
| |
| − | * make it decide which form to use based on the number of arguments given
| |
| − | * create a new [[Template:ep2]] or something.
| |
| − | | |
| − | What does everyone think?
| |
| − | | |
| − | Either way, maybe a bot could be run to convert the old into the new once we've decided on a form. And then once that's done, discard the old form. -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 20:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | : In the end, I've found and implemented another, more seamless approach for the episode tables. And it would be nice if people got into using the score template when entering a score other than in a round or episode table. It works like this:
| |
| − | : <nowiki>{{score|74|95}}</nowiki> → {{score|74|95}}
| |
| − | : <nowiki>{{score|106|76|Episode 4359}}</nowiki> → {{score|106|76|Episode 4359}}
| |
| − | -- [[User:Smjg|Smjg]] 20:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Welcome back online ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Well, either it was just me, or this site stopped working for a couple of months. [[User:Mglovesfun|Mglovesfun]] 18:43, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I believe it went down on its old www.countdownwiki.com address on 30th July, and then reappeared on the new wiki.apterous.org address on 10th August. Although there was no explanation given for the address change, I think it was only down for those 12 days. --[[User:Vande|Vande]] 19:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::Got the revised link following a posting on the forum. Hadn't realised that the address change was while you were away. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 21:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Low scores ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think that 9-round games should be added to the low 25 scores. For example, [[Douglas Whittle]] had a score of 11 so that should be in that category.Countdowner 14:07, 5/1/10 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == C1/C2 positioning ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The practice of champions moving over to the left-hand chair is relatively recent, introduced a few games into series 37, I believe. Prior to that, champions tended to stay in the chair in which they won their first match. Mike Brown's Countdown Page shows contenstants in their correct positions for all games, whereas here on the Wiki, many games prior to the change of practice are shown with the contestants in the wrong positions. It would be a useful exercise to bring those early series into line. --[[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 11:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Unbeaten contestants? ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | I'm wondering about starting a category for these. I suppose it boils down to:
| |
| − | # the reigning champion du jour
| |
| − | # octochamps of the current series, who haven't yet been eliminated in the finals
| |
| − | # any octochamps who nonetheless failed to make it to the finals (has this ever happened?)
| |
| − | # series champions who haven't yet appeared in a CoC or similar
| |
| − | # series champions who went on to win their CoCs
| |
| − | # contestants who withdrew without finishing their run for whatever reason (there must have been some of these in the show's 27-year history, but I've no idea who they are)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Of course, the definition of "unbeaten" would cover heats, finals, CoCs, SCs and specials alike. Still, it would be overkill to include 1, and possibly 2 as well, in this category. And we can probably ignore [[Celebrity Countdown]], where each contestant's appearance was a one-off. What do you think?
| |
| − | | |
| − | More to the point, does anybody have a list of them? -- [[User:Smjg|smjg]] 21:12, 2 April 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | : [[:Category:Unbeaten contestants]] has now been created. There are 7 in the list at the moment - any I've missed? -- [[User:Smjg|smjg]] 20:51, 28 August 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Adding Youtube videos ==
| |
| − | I need to know how to add Youtube videos to any page, you know embedding videos. Countdowner.
| |
| − | :Hi Countdowner,
| |
| − | | |
| − | :I don't think embedding YouTube videos into articles is encouraged for various reasons. However, linking to videos on YouTube is very much encouraged, and there are a couple of ways to do so. For short clips, the most simple way and elegant method is a standard external link, taking the form '<nowiki>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq0VWeTVWfY A short clip of Chris Philpot on Countdown]</nowiki>'. To further integrate the link into wiki house style, it's best to follow such links with '<nowiki>on [[wikipedia:YouTube|YouTube]]</nowiki>', which adds a link to the YouTube article on Wikipedia. Combined, the above code creates the following link:
| |
| − | | |
| − | :[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq0VWeTVWfY A short clip of Chris Philpot on Countdown] on [[wikipedia:YouTube|YouTube]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | :However, if you are linking to a whole episode which has been uploaded to YouTube in several smaller chunks, you should use [[Template:YouTube]], which ensures that the link you create is in the same style as the many others across the wiki, and which requires minimal code in the article itself. I hope this helps!
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Best wishes, [[User:Crispy|Chris 'Crispy' Philpot]] 13:09, 27 June 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | == Unofficial episodes appearing in categories ==
| |
| − | One thing that's bothered me for a while is the fact that games which are not intended for broadcast are included in the category '''Episodes with round details'''. These are included because the standard set of templates used for creating game recaps automatically generate the '''Episodes with round details''' category. There seem to be two classes of games which I believe are wrongly included in this category:
| |
| − | * games from co-events and similar
| |
| − | * fantasy and private games which appear in at least three people's talk pages
| |
| − | One solution, which I've tried out with one of the CoLin2010 games, is to use the new template Rx-letters instead of the standard template R-letters in the generation of such games
| |
| − | | |
| − | How do others feel about this? It should not be a difficult task to identify all the games which have been (in my view) wrongly categorised in this way, and amend them. Also, are there any other categories which non-broadcast games are seen in?.--[[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 11:46, 20 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | : Responses elsewhere approve, so going ahead.--[[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 17:36, 20 July 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :: It puzzles me that in the whole discussion you ignored the fact that {{tl|R-letters}} includes a parameter to suppress the category, even though you're the one who created {{tl|Rx-letters}} from it. But now that we have the latter, I don't suppose it matters which we use. -- [[User:Smjg|smjg]] 02:10, 6 October 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Unknown conundrum scrambles ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Currently, when a conundrum answer is available but the scramble is unknown, it's represented by question marks. IMO, this would be confusing and misleading to some people, because what is written in the "Selection" column should actually show what the selection is.
| |
| − | | |
| − | I've found a solution here: [[User:Mglovesfun/List of my amateur Countdown games]]. For some of the games, the author of the page has the answers but not the scrambles, so he gives all the vowels in alphabetical order and then all the consonants (e.g., {{word|AEIIDMMSX}} - {{word|MAXIMISED}}).
| |
| − | | |
| − | I don't know if this vowel-consonant order is a standard, but I am thinking we could do this for the televised games, too. However, we would have to tell these unknown scrambles apart from the ones we know. To do that we could type them in lowercase letters. For example, in [[Episode 817]]:
| |
| − | {{Rounds-start|Tony Vick|Steve Williams}}
| |
| − | {{R-conundrum|9|aeeicdjtv|c1time=1|c1sol=ADJECTIVE|70|70|81}}
| |
| − | {{R-conundrum|TB|eiouddmnp|c1time=26|c1sol=IMPOUNDED|80|70|81}}
| |
| − | {{Rounds-end}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | I can explain this system a little more if you want. Let me know what you think of it. [[User:JohnnyCanuck|JohnnyCanuck]] 12:55, 18 September 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | :One little problem - even when the scramble is typed in lower case, it appears in upper case. Otherwise, I like the idea, though alphabetical order without regard to vowels or consonants appeals to me even more.--[[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 18:33, 18 September 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | ::It's true that the letters still appear in uppercase, but they are physically smaller, and can easily be told apart from the others. As for which alphabetical order to use, it doesn't really matter. I'm going to try this out (using your suggestion of regular alphabetical order) on one page as an example. [[User:JohnnyCanuck|JohnnyCanuck]] 18:47, 18 September 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :: IMO it's a welcome idea as long as we supplement it with a comment indicating that the scramble is unknown, otherwise someone unfamiliar with the notation'll sooner or later change them to uppercase, and then the information that the scramble is unknown'll be lost. -- [[User:Smjg|smjg]] 20:52, 5 October 2010 (BST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==[http://wiki.apterous.org/index.php?title=Special:UserLogout&returnto=Episode_2874&returntoquery=action%3Dedit This page]==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Should be changed because you can't use [{Countdown]] anonymously any more. --[[User:The Doctor|The Doctor]] 11:33, 19 October 2010 (BST)
| |
