|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Good idea having this page.
| | {{episode|previous=Episode 3398|next=Episode 3400}} |
| I've started to add links to recaps concerning octochamps, as all other linked recaps are now for series 50 and earlier, and my dictionary covers series 51 and beyond (if I've read it right). Just done Ross Allatt's first, to see how it looks. Presumably Viscounts should be included too. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 08:02, 20 September 2007 (BST)
| | '''Episode 3399''' was broadcast on 17 January 2003, as part of [[Series 49]]. |
| :Great stuff. Good to keep setting ourselves attainable targets. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 12:42, 20 September 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| Does the Wiki editor prevent two people editing a page or a page section simultaneously? If not, we have the possibility of two of us fixing the same recap. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 11:22, 20 September 2007 (BST)
| | [[Rupert Stokoe]] played [[John Rawnsley]], with John Rawnsley winning 89 - 70. The [[Dictionary Corner]] guest was [[Tim Rice]], and the [[lexicographer]] was [[Susie Dent]]. |
| :It doesn't (in fact it's not possible to.) so that is indeed a worry. Perhaps we should set aside a series each? I'd be happy to take on Series 51. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 12:42, 20 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| ::I'll go for series 55 then. Would've offered series 56, but I haven't watched it all yet. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 12:53, 20 September 2007 (BST)
| |
|
| |
|
| Thanks for the info about the bug after recap dumper. I've found a few where that's happened, and sure enough, the stuff is all there. Recap dumper is still required on two of the series 55 octochamp programmes, however; the bug doesn't apply to these. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 18:05, 22 September 2007 (BST)
| | {{DEFAULTSORT:3399}} |
| | | [[Category:15-round games]] |
| | | [[Category:Episodes in Championship of Champions XI]] |
| <b>Misdeclarations in letters rounds</b>. A convention which I've seen done by one other person once, and which I've also followed once, seems ok to me - have the usual cross, followed by a superscripted suffix indicating the incorrect count declared.
| | [[Category:Episodes presented by Richard Whiteley]] |
| e.g. BOLLOCKS ☓<sup>7</sup> [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 18:12, 22 September 2007 (BST)
| | [[Category:Episodes with Susie Dent as lexicographer]] |
| | | [[Category:Episodes with Tim Rice as a guest]] |
| | |
| <b>Suggestion for handling tie-breaks</b>. I suggest that these handled slightly differently in two ways.
| |
| First, a slight difference in the wording in the preamble, see Episode 4319 for an example.
| |
| Second, when giving details of the tie-break conundrum, this can use the standard R-conundrum format, but the round number could be shown as TB, rather than 16, and no entries are made in scores, either for the contestants or for the maximum. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 16:05, 23 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| :I agree with all of that except for showing the contestants' scores - they are shown on the programme and I suspect omitting them is likely to cause more confusion than it avoids. I will compile a list of episodes with tie breaks at some point soon and update the pages accordingly. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 16:19, 23 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| ::OK. I go along with that. Once the 4319 recap has been posted, can you run dumper on it, and then I'll tidy that one up while it's still fresh in my mind. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 16:24, 23 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| :::Round dump added, as you probably saw already. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 11:56, 27 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| | |
| <b>Stile Guide</b>. I'm thinking about a stile guide. I did say <b>thinking</b>, which does not necessarily mean <b>writing</b> :)
| |
| | |
| One thing that would help in such a guide is to be able to write something like:
| |
| R-letters| 6|LTBIEIDNR|BINDER |BLINDER |TRILBIED* |14|30|44
| |
| preceded and followed by two curly brackets,
| |
| and get it displayed as written, rather than have it converted. Is there a simple way of switching conversion on and off within a page? [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 10:12, 24 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| :Anything between <nowiki> and </nowiki> won't get formatted. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 18:02, 24 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| ::Thanks. Just the sort of control instruction I was wanting. [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 18:32, 24 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| | |
| <b>Specials dictionary</b> All special games were recorded end of 2002/mid-2003, so NODE would have been the authority used at the time.
| |
| | |
| '''Spam question for Soo, or anyone else'''
| |
| I've been trying a dummy edit on a few pages, one of which is episode 3978, in order to get the output of the recap dumper displayed. Show preview works well, but Save page displays what is said to be a Spam Guard, inviting me to type a couple of words. Is this genuine? Or is it itself spam? Am I concerned, needlessly? [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 20:31, 28 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| :There is a spam guard system in place, because we were getting quite a volume of spam. It only kicks in when external links are added (I think) so it shouldn't be popping up for any normal edits. I tried the episode you suggested and it saved fine. If the problem happens again, you can respond to the spam query safely but let me know - if it starts happening too often then I'll look into replacing it with a different one. [[User:Reams|Soo]] 00:07, 29 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| ::Thanks for response. It happened with me twice yesterday when running a dummy edit in order to display a page correctly after a dumper run has resulted in a blank page. Presumably, the external link which the spam guard is referring to is the link to the recap. Just tried another, 4023, and again got the Spam guard warning. Accepted it this time, and all worked ok. I was probably being a little over cautious, as the warning was reminiscent of a trojan I had a few months ago (and which I've successfully cleared). [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 09:07, 29 September 2007 (BST)
| |
| | |
| <b>Important notice</b> I've read the notice, and will stop work on the programmes of the series 54 octochamps. I'm happy to assist with series 50 and earlier, but don't have the appropriate dictionary. For the later series, the only time that the dictionary had been really necessary has been the ones for which dumper made a cock-up, and didn't give all the letters for the letter rounds. So maybe it's not so important to have it. Do you want me to attempt any of the series 50 and earlier progs? Or is it better to wait and see what happens? [[User:Drawoh|Drawoh]] 17:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
| |
