Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "Template:Featuredarticle"

From Countdown
(delete double-mention)
(this month's article)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Mark Tournoff.jpg|right|thumb|195px|[[Mark Tournoff]] narrowly avoided having the highest ever losing score.]]
+
[[Image:Countdown letters game.jpg||thumb|right|Example of a letters game.]]
'''[[Episode 4121]]''' featured [[Matthew Shore]] and [[Mark Tournoff]] in the [[Championship of Champions XII]] first quarter-final. Shore had just beaten the previously unbeaten [[Chris Cummins]] and Tournoff had beaten [[Steve Graston]]. The game started gently with a six and three sevens, before Tournoff beat his opponent on the [[numbers game]]. After another seven, the game came alive with {{Word|PAINTIEST}} in round 7, followed by {{word|OVERRUN}} and {{word|QUIETEN}}. A difficult numbers game failed to beat either player, and Tournoff was on a score of 86 out of a possible 86, while Shore was on 76, only dropping points on the first numbers game. In round 11, both players got another [[letters game|nine]] with {{word|HERNIATES}} and Tournoff had 104 out of a possible 104. In the next round, Tournoff missed {{word|PISTEURS}} opting for the invalid {{word|PURSIEST}} instead, and in the next round had {{word|FLOOK}} disallowed, although Shore had {{word|FORMAL}} for six anyway. After an easy numbers game ((25×10)+4+1) the players were on 117 and 114 with Shore leading by 3 points. The highest ever losing score was [[episode 3391|111]] by [[David Williams (Series 43)|David Williams]], losing to [[Chris Wills]] in the [[Championship of Champions XI]] and both players had already surpassed that, meaning that even if neither player got the conundrum, Tournoff would set the new highest losing score record with 114. [[Des Lynam]] informed them of this and the conundrum {{word|SILLYQUOO}} was revealed, solved in 1 second by Tournoff won won the game 124 - 117, 117 is still the highest ever losing score in a game of [[Countdown]].
+
A '''letters game''' is one of the 11 rounds during a [[15 round format|15 round game]] in which the contestant chooses 9 letters by selecting either a vowel or a consonant until there is a total of 9 letters. The player in the champions chair chooses 6 letters games and the challenger chooses 5, but gets an extra choice of [[Numbers game|numbers]]. The player can choose the letters in any order, but the selection must include at least 4 consonants and 3 vowels, hence there are only three valid choices in modern Countdown: 3 vowels, 6 consonants; 4 vowels, 5 consonants and 5 vowels, 4 consonants.
 +
 
 +
When the show was first broadcast, and for a number of years, contestants could choose as many vowels and consonants as they liked, which often led to poor selections where only 4's and 5's were available. Since then the rules have been changed. In the original [[9 round game|9-round format]], there were 6 letters games.
 +
 
 +
A player scores points on a letters game by writing down a valid word within the 30 seconds. This word must be in the current New Oxford English Dictionary, but not a proper noun, nor an abbreviation. Players can use each lettter only once, but can use a letter more than once if it appears more than once in the selection. For example from {{word|EEEECDLST}} the player could play {{word|SELECTED}}, which uses three E's, but there are four E's in the selection. Words score 1 point per letter, but 18 points for a nine-letter word.
 +
 
 +
Unlike the game of [[Scrabble]], [[Countdown]] does not allow all nouns to have a plural form. In particular, a mass noun is a noun that that does not logically have a plural, like {{word|GUNFIRE}} or {{word|HEALTH}} -- in standard English they would rarely be used in the plural. This system has been the cause of some controversy and confusion. Since the start of [[Series 49]], the rules have been refined to allow the plural of some mass nouns; for example, {{word|CONGEES}} was allowed in [[Series 58]] because it was argued that one could ask for "two congees". Again this rule has been enforced with some inconsistency, and words like {{word|OPALINES}} have been allowed on some occasions and not others.
  
  
 
<noinclude>[[Category:Countdown:Main Page|Featured article]]</noinclude>
 
<noinclude>[[Category:Countdown:Main Page|Featured article]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 10:24, 1 November 2008

Example of a letters game.

A letters game is one of the 11 rounds during a 15 round game in which the contestant chooses 9 letters by selecting either a vowel or a consonant until there is a total of 9 letters. The player in the champions chair chooses 6 letters games and the challenger chooses 5, but gets an extra choice of numbers. The player can choose the letters in any order, but the selection must include at least 4 consonants and 3 vowels, hence there are only three valid choices in modern Countdown: 3 vowels, 6 consonants; 4 vowels, 5 consonants and 5 vowels, 4 consonants.

When the show was first broadcast, and for a number of years, contestants could choose as many vowels and consonants as they liked, which often led to poor selections where only 4's and 5's were available. Since then the rules have been changed. In the original 9-round format, there were 6 letters games.

A player scores points on a letters game by writing down a valid word within the 30 seconds. This word must be in the current New Oxford English Dictionary, but not a proper noun, nor an abbreviation. Players can use each lettter only once, but can use a letter more than once if it appears more than once in the selection. For example from EEEECDLST the player could play SELECTED, which uses three E's, but there are four E's in the selection. Words score 1 point per letter, but 18 points for a nine-letter word.

Unlike the game of Scrabble, Countdown does not allow all nouns to have a plural form. In particular, a mass noun is a noun that that does not logically have a plural, like GUNFIRE or HEALTH -- in standard English they would rarely be used in the plural. This system has been the cause of some controversy and confusion. Since the start of Series 49, the rules have been refined to allow the plural of some mass nouns; for example, CONGEES was allowed in Series 58 because it was argued that one could ask for "two congees". Again this rule has been enforced with some inconsistency, and words like OPALINES have been allowed on some occasions and not others.