Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.

Difference between revisions of "User:The Doctor/Series 63 Predictions"

From Countdown
(update. Shock in store.)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
===Normal Seedings===
 
===Normal Seedings===
 
{{Seed table}}
 
{{Seed table}}
{{Seed| 1| [[Jack Hurst]]                            |8|946|w}}
+
{{Seed| 1| [[Jack Hurst]]                            |8|946}}
{{Seed| 2| [[Eoin Monaghan]]                        |8|898|w}}
+
{{Seed| 2| [[Eoin Monaghan]]                        |8|898}}
{{Seed| 3| [[Daniel Pati]]                          |8|840|w}}
+
{{Seed| 3| [[Daniel Pati]]                          |8|840}}
{{Seed| 4| [[Scott Gillies]]                         |8|810|w}}
+
{{Seed| 4| [[Marcus Hares]]                         |8|834}}
{{Seed| 5| [[Tom Rowell]]                           |8|774|w}}
+
{{Seed| 5| [[Scott Gillies]]                         |8|810}}
{{Seed| 6| [[Marcus Hares]]*                        |7|730|w}}
+
{{Seed| 6| [[Tom Rowell]]                           |8|774}}
{{Seed| 7| [[Michael Chadwick]]                     |7|706}}
+
{{Seed| 7| [[Niall Young]]                           |7|726}}
 
{{Seed| 8| [[Peter Godwin]]                          |7|705}}
 
{{Seed| 8| [[Peter Godwin]]                          |7|705}}
 
{{Seed table end}}
 
{{Seed table end}}
Line 19: Line 19:
 
{{Seed|2|[[Eoin Monaghan]]||112.25}}
 
{{Seed|2|[[Eoin Monaghan]]||112.25}}
 
{{Seed|3|[[Daniel Pati]]||105}}
 
{{Seed|3|[[Daniel Pati]]||105}}
{{seed|4|''[[Marcus Hares]]''||104.29}}
+
{{seed|4|[[Marcus Hares]]||104.25}}
 
{{Seed|5|[[Scott Gillies]]||101.25}}
 
{{Seed|5|[[Scott Gillies]]||101.25}}
 
{{Seed|6|[[Tom Rowell]]||96.75}}
 
{{Seed|6|[[Tom Rowell]]||96.75}}
{{Seed|7|[[Michael Chadwick]]||88.25}}
+
{{Seed|7|[[Niall Young]]||90.75}}
 
{{Seed|8|[[Peter Godwin]]||88.125}}
 
{{Seed|8|[[Peter Godwin]]||88.125}}
 
{{seed table end}}
 
{{seed table end}}
Line 32: Line 32:
 
{{seed|2|[[Eoin Monaghan]]||87.1%}}
 
{{seed|2|[[Eoin Monaghan]]||87.1%}}
 
{{seed|3|[[Daniel Pati]]||83.3%}}
 
{{seed|3|[[Daniel Pati]]||83.3%}}
{{seed|4|''[[Marcus Hares]]''||82.3%}}
+
{{seed|4|[[Marcus Hares]]||82.0%}}
{{seed|5|''[[Scott Gillies]]''||78.3%}}
+
{{seed|''5''|''[[Tom Rowell]]''|''''|''80.2%''}}
{{seed|''6''|''[[Peter Godwin]]''|''''|''70%''}}
+
{{seed|''6''|''[[Scott Gillies]]''|''''|''78.3%''}}
{{seed|''7''|''[[Michael Chadwick]]''||68.5%}}
+
{{seed|7|[[Niall Young]]||72.3%}}
{{seed|''8''|''[[Tom Rowell]]''|''''|''58.6%''}}
+
{{seed|8|[[Peter Godwin]]||70%}}
 
{{seed table end}}
 
{{seed table end}}
  
 
==Finals Progress==
 
==Finals Progress==
 +
===Prediction===
 
Scores are determined by % of max. Seeds are normal.
 
Scores are determined by % of max. Seeds are normal.
 
{{finals progress
 
{{finals progress
 
| 1 = [[Jack Hurst]] | q1w = 1 | s1w = 1 | fw = 1
 
| 1 = [[Jack Hurst]] | q1w = 1 | s1w = 1 | fw = 1
 
| 8 = [[Peter Godwin]]
 
| 8 = [[Peter Godwin]]
| 5 = [[Tom Rowell]]
+
| 5 = [[Scott Gillies]]
| 4 = [[Scott Gillies]] | q4w = 4
+
| 4 = [[Marcus Hares]] | q4w = 4
 
| 3 = [[Daniel Pati]] | q3w = 3
 
| 3 = [[Daniel Pati]] | q3w = 3
| 6 = [[Marcus Hares]]  
+
| 6 = [[Tom Rowell]]  
| 7 = [[Michael Chadwick]]
+
| 7 = [[Niall Young]]
 
| 2 = [[Eoin Monaghan]] | q2w = 2 | s2w = 2
 
| 2 = [[Eoin Monaghan]] | q2w = 2 | s2w = 2
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
===Reality===
 +
{{finals progress
 +
| 1 = [[Jack Hurst]] | q1w = 1 | s1w = 1 | fw = 1
 +
| 8 = [[Peter Godwin]]
 +
| 5 = [[Scott Gillies]]
 +
| 4 = [[Marcus Hares]] | q4w = 4
 +
| 3 = [[Daniel Pati]] | q3w = 3
 +
| 6 = [[Tom Rowell]]
 +
| 7 = [[Niall Young]]
 +
| 2 = [[Eoin Monaghan]] | q2w = 2 | s2w = 2
 +
}}
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
'''My Predictions were 100% accurate.'''

Latest revision as of 16:25, 17 December 2010

This is my predictions for the finals of Series 63.

Current seedings

Normal Seedings

Rank Name Wins Points
1 Jack Hurst 8 946
2 Eoin Monaghan 8 898
3 Daniel Pati 8 840
4 Marcus Hares 8 834
5 Scott Gillies 8 810
6 Tom Rowell 8 774
7 Niall Young 7 726
8 Peter Godwin 7 705

Average Seedings

Italics equal differences.

Rank Name Wins Points
1 Jack Hurst 118.25
2 Eoin Monaghan 112.25
3 Daniel Pati 105
4 Marcus Hares 104.25
5 Scott Gillies 101.25
6 Tom Rowell 96.75
7 Niall Young 90.75
8 Peter Godwin 88.125

Percentage of max

Italics equal differences.

Rank Name Wins Points
1 Jack Hurst 91.8%
2 Eoin Monaghan 87.1%
3 Daniel Pati 83.3%
4 Marcus Hares 82.0%
5 Tom Rowell ' 80.2%
6 Scott Gillies ' 78.3%
7 Niall Young 72.3%
8 Peter Godwin 70%

Finals Progress

Prediction

Scores are determined by % of max. Seeds are normal.

Jack Hurst (1) vs Peter Godwin (8) Jack Hurst (1) vs Marcus Hares (4) Jack Hurst (1)
vs
Eoin Monaghan (2)
Scott Gillies (5) vs Marcus Hares (4)
Daniel Pati (3) vs Tom Rowell (6) Daniel Pati (3) vs Eoin Monaghan (2)
Niall Young (7) vs Eoin Monaghan (2)
The winner of each game is displayed in bold.

Reality

Jack Hurst (1) vs Peter Godwin (8) Jack Hurst (1) vs Marcus Hares (4) Jack Hurst (1)
vs
Eoin Monaghan (2)
Scott Gillies (5) vs Marcus Hares (4)
Daniel Pati (3) vs Tom Rowell (6) Daniel Pati (3) vs Eoin Monaghan (2)
Niall Young (7) vs Eoin Monaghan (2)
The winner of each game is displayed in bold.



My Predictions were 100% accurate.