Due to persistent vandalism, account creation has been suspended. If you would like an account, please contact Charlie Reams on Apterous.
Difference between revisions of "User:The Doctor/Series 71 Predictions"
From Countdown
The Doctor (talk | contribs) (Created page with "They're back! Predictions for Series 71: ==Datasets== ===Normal Seedings=== {{Seed table}} {{Seed|1 |Dan McColm |8|942}} {{Seed|2 |Antoinette Ryan |8|85...") |
The Doctor (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Normal Seedings=== | ===Normal Seedings=== | ||
{{Seed table}} | {{Seed table}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] | | + | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] |9|1,051}} |
{{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] |8|859}} | {{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] |8|859}} | ||
{{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] |8|857}} | {{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] |8|857}} | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] |8|794}} | {{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] |8|794}} | ||
{{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |7|624}} | {{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |7|624}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |6| | + | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |6|707}} |
{{Seed table end}} | {{Seed table end}} | ||
===Average Scores=== | ===Average Scores=== | ||
All figures are correct to three decimal places. | All figures are correct to three decimal places. | ||
{{Seed table}} | {{Seed table}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] || | + | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] ||116.778}} |
{{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] ||107.375}} | {{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] ||107.375}} | ||
{{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] ||107.125}} | {{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] ||107.125}} | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{Seed|5 |[[George Ford]] ||104}} | {{Seed|5 |[[George Ford]] ||104}} | ||
{{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] ||99.25}} | {{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] ||99.25}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |Up 1| | + | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |Up 1|88.375}} |
{{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |Down 1|78}} | {{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |Down 1|78}} | ||
{{seed table end}} | {{seed table end}} | ||
| − | ===Total Max Available=== | + | ===Total Prelim Max Available=== |
Paul Worsley only played seven games, his score has been multiplied by (8 ÷ 7), and has been rounded to zero decimal places. | Paul Worsley only played seven games, his score has been multiplied by (8 ÷ 7), and has been rounded to zero decimal places. | ||
{{Seed table}} | {{Seed table}} | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
All figures are correct to three decimal places. | All figures are correct to three decimal places. | ||
{{Seed table}} | {{Seed table}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] ||91. | + | {{Seed|1 |[[Dan McColm]] ||91.710%}} |
{{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] |Up 1|84.350%}} | {{Seed|3 |[[Tricia Pay]] |Up 1|84.350%}} | ||
{{Seed|5 |[[George Ford]] |Up 2|84.211%}} | {{Seed|5 |[[George Ford]] |Up 2|84.211%}} | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
{{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] |Down 3|78.591%}} | {{Seed|2 |[[Antoinette Ryan]] |Down 3|78.591%}} | ||
{{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] ||77.843%}} | {{Seed|6 |[[Laurence Killen]] ||77.843%}} | ||
| − | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |Up 1| | + | {{Seed|8 |[[Paul Worsley]] |Up 1|69.246%}} |
{{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |Down 1|60.290%}} | {{Seed|7 |[[David Stanford]] |Down 1|60.290%}} | ||
{{seed table end}} | {{seed table end}} | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
===Actuality=== | ===Actuality=== | ||
{{finals progress | {{finals progress | ||
| − | | 1 = [[Dan McColm]] | + | | 1 = [[Dan McColm]] | q1w = 1 |
| 8 = [[Paul Worsley]] | | 8 = [[Paul Worsley]] | ||
| 5 = [[George Ford]] | | 5 = [[George Ford]] | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 10 December 2014
They're back! Predictions for Series 71:
Contents
Datasets
Normal Seedings
| Rank | Name | Wins | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan McColm | 9 | 1,051 |
| 2 | Antoinette Ryan | 8 | 859 |
| 3 | Tricia Pay | 8 | 857 |
| 4 | Mark Davies | 8 | 844 |
| 5 | George Ford | 8 | 832 |
| 6 | Laurence Killen | 8 | 794 |
| 7 | David Stanford | 7 | 624 |
| 8 | Paul Worsley | 6 | 707 |
Average Scores
All figures are correct to three decimal places.
| Rank | Name | Wins | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan McColm | 116.778 | |
| 2 | Antoinette Ryan | 107.375 | |
| 3 | Tricia Pay | 107.125 | |
| 4 | Mark Davies | 105.5 | |
| 5 | George Ford | 104 | |
| 6 | Laurence Killen | 99.25 | |
| 8 | Paul Worsley | Up 1 | 88.375 |
| 7 | David Stanford | Down 1 | 78 |
Total Prelim Max Available
Paul Worsley only played seven games, his score has been multiplied by (8 ÷ 7), and has been rounded to zero decimal places.
| Rank | Name | Wins | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Antoinette Ryan | Up 1 | 1,093 |
| 7 | David Stanford | Down 5 | 1,035 |
| 4 | Mark Davies | Up 1 | 1,030 |
| 8 | Paul Worsley | Up 4 | 1,030 |
| 1 | Dan McColm | Down 4 | 1,026 |
| 6 | Laurence Killen | 1,020 | |
| 3 | Tricia Pay | Down 4 | 1,016 |
| 5 | George Ford | Down 3 | 988 |
Percentage Of Max Gained
All figures are correct to three decimal places.
| Rank | Name | Wins | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dan McColm | 91.710% | |
| 3 | Tricia Pay | Up 1 | 84.350% |
| 5 | George Ford | Up 2 | 84.211% |
| 4 | Mark Davies | 81.942% | |
| 2 | Antoinette Ryan | Down 3 | 78.591% |
| 6 | Laurence Killen | 77.843% | |
| 8 | Paul Worsley | Up 1 | 69.246% |
| 7 | David Stanford | Down 1 | 60.290% |
Predictions
Hypothesis
| Dan McColm (1) vs Paul Worsley (8) | Dan McColm (1) vs George Ford (5) | Dan McColm (1) vs Tricia Pay (3) |
| George Ford (5) vs Mark Davies (4) | ||
| Tricia Pay (3) vs Laurence Killen (6) | Tricia Pay (3) vs Antoinette Ryan (2) | |
| David Stanford (7) vs Antoinette Ryan (2) |
Actuality
| Dan McColm (1) vs Paul Worsley (8) | ||
| George Ford (5) vs Mark Davies (4) | ||
| Tricia Pay (3) vs Laurence Killen (6) | ||
| David Stanford (7) vs Antoinette Ryan (2) |
